Greenhills v. WRC

In 2025, the Board of Directors of Greenhills Master Association initiated litigation against members of the WRC. Below are links to various documents that illuminate problems with the litigation as well as speak to the disinformation propagated by GHMA board members. We draw your attention to the following in particular.

Various invoices for maintenance of the lakes up to Sept 1, 2025 sent to Greenhills Board of Directors and as of this date (October 18, 2025) remain unpaid. The total amounts to $85,267.84. All other entities in the WRC have paid and are up to date.
An invoice sent to the Greenhills Board of Directors for the rehabilitation of the Kona Well. As of this date (October 18, 2025), the invoice remains unpaid for an additional $24,996.41. All other entities in the WRC have paid and are up to date.
A declaration by John Campbell in which false claims are made.
An email from WRC attorney to Greenhills non-HOA attorney offering to mediate. As of this date, Greenhills has not responded.
An email from John Campbell to Sierra Golf Management via Dan Bacci. This is coupled with a response from the WRC attorney in which additional disinformation by Campbell is dispelled.

Maintenance invoices

Kona Well invoice

John Campbell declaration

Email re mediation

Campbell email and attorney response

ADDENDUM: Posted October 30, 2025

Repeatedly, the current president of the board of Greenhills Master Association has referred to

their litigation with the WRC as a “water dispute.” This post is a correction of this

misinformation and incorrect designation of the nature of the litigation.

There is no dispute over water. The water in the Agreement is, and always has been, excess irrigation water. In fact, the Agreement the four entities drafted and signed onto in 2021 was formed, in part, to prevent disputes over water and water rights. No such protection existed prior to the Agreement.
The litigation filed by Greenhills claims fraud and conspiracy on the part of some WRC members. It is not clear what the fraud and conspiracy are as these are not spelled out in the documents filed by former Greenhills attorney, Justin Harris. The members of the WRC maintain any claims of fraud and conspiracy are false.
The litigation also claims John Campbell and two others have “rightful seats” on the WRC and that the WRC is in breach by not seating them on the council. As will be shown and is evident from the 2021 Agreement and its amendments, there is no guarantee of any nominee from any of the four entities being automatically seated by mere nomination from an individual entity.
The litigation also claims the percent Greenhills pays for its share of the water delivery system is excessive. However, the claim does not specify what Greenhills believes its fair share is or how they would arrive at that number. In addition, before the litigation was filed, Greenhills walked away from discussions in the WRC about appropriate percentages, thus creating the very problem they claim is unfair in the litigation.

We believe it is important for all members of the WRC to be aware of the inaccuracies and misinformation currently being propagated by the current president of Greenhills Master Association.